LET THEM EAT {GRAS}
{Generally Recognized as Safe} - FDA does not have a legal definition for nanotechnology. Of course they don't...
The United States Food and Drug Administration is the only federal member agency of the National Nanotechnology Initiative without a legal definition for nanotechnology.
Cosmetics Nanotechnology
Food and Drug Administration (.gov)
https://www.fda.gov
› cosmetics-science-research › co...
Mar 24, 2022 — FDA does not have a legal definition for nanotechnology. However, when scientists talk about nanotechnology they are usually referring to...
Guidance for Industry
Food and Drug Administration (.gov)
https://www.fda.gov
FDA has not established regulatory definitions of “nanotechnology,” “nanomaterial,” “nanoscale,” or other related terms.
FDA says no new labeling for nanotech products
check these dates…
Jul 25, 2007 — The FDA now treats products made with nanotechnology the same way it handles all products -- requiring companies to prove safety and efficacy...
"The U.S. Government Accountability Office is an independent, nonpartisan government agency within the legislative branch that provides auditing, evaluative, and investigative services for the United States Congress. It is the supreme audit institution of the federal government of the United States." (Wiki)
Get this....
'Food Safety: FDA Should Strengthen Its Oversight of Food Ingredients Determined to Be Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)'
U.S. Government Accountability Office
Mar 05, 2010.
"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is responsible for ensuring the safety of most of the U.S. food supply, is not required to review substances, such as spices and preservatives, added to food that are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for their intended use. Currently, companies may determine a substance is GRAS without FDA's approval or knowledge."
https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-10-246
"FDA's approach to regulating nanotechnology allows engineered nanomaterials to enter the food supply as GRAS substances without FDA's knowledge."
When government investigates itself and actually finds something wrong, but it's still okay, because the government didn't know and still doesn't know.
The trick, not having a legal definition for Nanotechnology means the FDA legally doesn't know, therefore, any real evidence of 'nanotechnology' in foods, cosmetics, and prescription drugs presented by civilians is intentionally perceived as contrived.
"Plausible deniability is the ability of people, typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command, to deny knowledge of or responsibility for actions committed by members of their organizational hierarchy." (wiki)
Maintaining plausible deniability is the 1st law of covert operations, followed closely by concocting an official version of what happened and sticking to it...
plausible deniability
Political Dictionary
https://politicaldictionary.com
Plausible deniability is the ability to deny any involvement in illegal or unethical activities, because there is no clear evidence to prove involvement.
Follow Ramon…
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2526834287368217&set=a.125829707468699
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=5901460833238862&set=a.125829707468699
From the end of May, the FDA approved "vaccination" through the food supply:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/save-the-animals
I guess, what they meant was nanotech...
It seems to be on a need-to-know basis, and people apparently, don't "need to know."
This may fit with the apocalypse- our blood and dna is turning satanic and when humanity can no longer be saved it begins. there is a chemical in water that affects testosterone .